Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.7 Max
- Qwen3.8 27BAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27B | 83/100 | 75/100 | 38/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.50/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3
39K
Completed sessions
5
86,729
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
731K-100%
32B-89%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
49.3%1.3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 27B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 27B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 27B vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 27B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba Mini