Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	55/100	82/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	89/100	64/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.12/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

24K

241K

Completed sessions

379,755

7,257,281

Token share

0.07%

0.4%

Tokens

763B+100%

4.5T+154%

AUG 29OCT 23

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.