GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.5

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101756/100100/10055/10082/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.517/10053/10076/10093/10067/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.002962/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
24K
1.2M
Completed sessions
379,755
48,995,377
Token share
0.07%
3.02%
Tokens
763B+100%
34T+7%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
70.6%23K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.