Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5-Codex
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5-CodexOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 72/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-5-Codex | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 100/100 | 20/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$1.10/ 1M
Output
$0.42/ 1M
$9.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0042/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.3M
0
Completed sessions
85,856,977
1
Token share
32.5%
0%
Tokens
369T+100%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5-Codex vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5-Codex·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5-Codex vs Jamba MiniGPT-5-Codex·Jamba Mini