Compare AI models: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5 Nano
- Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
- GPT-5 NanoOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 50/100 | 81/100 | 32/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | 50/100 |
| GPT-5 Nano | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 74/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$3.75/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.07/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
11K
Completed sessions
17
86,702
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
73K+100%
6.2B+157%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGemini 3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGemini 3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5 Nano vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5 Nano·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGemini 3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniGemini 3.8 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5 Nano vs Jamba MiniGPT-5 Nano·Jamba Mini