Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-5 Mini
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GPT-5 MiniOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 71/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GPT-5 Mini | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 48/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.23/ 1M
Output
$0.55/ 1M
$1.82/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
921K
0
Completed sessions
125,471,026
3
Token share
16.5%
0%
Tokens
187T+100%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5 Mini vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5 Mini·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5 Mini vs Jamba MiniGPT-5 Mini·Jamba Mini