Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 71/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GPT-6 Astra | 100/100 | 100/100 | 3/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 75/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Output
$0.55/ 1M
$50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
921K
0
Completed sessions
125,471,026
2
Token share
16.5%
0%
Tokens
187T+100%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6 Astra vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6 Astra·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6 Astra vs Jamba MiniGPT-6 Astra·Jamba Mini