Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Grok 4.5
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 71/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 24/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.55/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
921K
7.2K
Completed sessions
125,471,026
38,250
Token share
16.5%
0%
Tokens
187T+100%
758M-99%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
46.4%373 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba Mini