Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 71/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 73/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.12/ 1M
Output
$0.55/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
920K
1,000K
Completed sessions
125,468,079
13,051,900
Token share
16.6%
2.71%
Tokens
187T+100%
31T-33%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
63.2%93K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba Mini