Compare AI models: Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Kimi K3
- Kimi K2 Thinking TurboMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 64/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Kimi K3 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 10/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$3.00/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$15/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
250K
Completed sessions
No usage
760,002
Token share
No usage
0.05%
Tokens
No usage
564B-67%
No trend data
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
42.1%24K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2 Thinking Turbo·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Jamba MiniKimi K2 Thinking Turbo·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3 vs Jamba MiniKimi K3·Jamba Mini